Bitcoin’s Share of PoW Mining Rewards Now Above 80percent

Rewards obtained by bitcoin miners form a significant chunk of their wages paid across important proof of labour (PoW) blockchains, according to Yassine Elmandjra, per cent cryptocurrency analyst in ARK Invest.

For instance, bitcoin miners were paid within $15 million value of this cryptocurrency as incentive to mine cubes and protected the network on Jan. 9. Meanwhile, the overall benefits paid across bitcoin (BTC), ethereum (ETH) along with other significant PoW cryptocurrencies such as zcash (ZEC), litecoin (LTC), ethereum classic (ETC), bitcoin cash (BCH) and bitcoin SV (BSV) were only a little more than $18 million.

Essentially, bitcoin miners were responsible for nearly 83 percentage of the entire mining benefits paid across important PoW blockchains. 

Since mid-2017, bitcoin miners’ salary share has improved by 250 percentage, although that of ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency, has decreased appreciably. 

Proof-of-work is a consensus algorithm for blockchain networks at which miners find cubes by solving cryptographically tough puzzles. This is compared to this proof-of-stake (PoS), in which validators lock the individual cryptocurrency to maintain their stake in the ecosystem. 

Strongest coin

The fact that bitcoin miners are drawing considerably higher wages than their counterparts isn’t surprising, given bitcoin is your most powerful PoW-powered coin using the greatest network impact and the maximum track record, based on Muneeb Ali, CEO of Blockstack PBC. 

A network impact is the concept that as adoption and integration into a system grows, so does its worth — and in an exponential speed instead of in a linear speed. 

Back at 2016, bitcoin expert Trace Mayer mentioned the shop of value charm, safety and speculation which bitcoin’s network impact would increase quickly.

“The cryptocurrency has almost totally captured the store of value narrative, allowing for consolidation around the strongest coin,” Blockstack’s Ali said. 

Further, bitcoin’s network safety, as reflected by its own hash pace, has increased sharply through time, helping build confidence at the blockchain and establishing a positive feedback loop of safety and network impact. At press time, bitcoin’s hash speed is approximately 100,000,000 Terahashes (or 100 exahashes).

Looking forwards

Bitcoin’s share of PoW mining might grow much bigger in the future as ethereum along with other blockchains begin changing to proof-of-stake, which can be less energy-intensive consensus mechanism,” stated Ali. 

Ethereum is anticipated to finish the transition from PoW into PoS by 2022. “Its network will be better once ETH 2.0 (post-transition) shows its true value in the global market,” Steve Tsou, Global CEO of RRMine, advised CoinDesk.

Another variable that could impact miner’s earnings and sway bitcoin’s share of PoW mining would be your reward halving expected in four weeks. The rewards obtained for per cube mined on bitcoin’s blockchain will be lowered by 12.5 BTC to 6. 25 BTC sometime in May. Mining prices will double article halving which may crowd out feeble miners, inducing changes between demand and supply.

RRMine’s Tsou stated miners’ earnings increases if halving produces a supply shortage, pushing prices over mining expenses. That may also increase bitcoin’s share of PoW mining — so, as raised profitability may entice miners from different chains.

“The most important thing is that the miners control the cost, which completely determines if the miners can profit from it,” Tsou said. 

However, if prices fall sharply, controlling price is going to be a struggle and miners may depart, potentially leading to a fall in bitcoin’s share of PoW mining. 

Disclosure Read More

The leader in blockchain information, CoinDesk is a media outlet that tries for the greatest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.


Comments (No)

Leave a Reply